Platform Comparison
WordPress vs Joomla: An Honest 2026 Assessment
Two decades ago this was the web’s great rivalry. In 2026 it’s a different page: one platform runs two-fifths of the web, the other holds a loyal 1.2% — and most people searching this comparison are really asking whether it’s time to move. We answer that honestly, both directions. Updated August 2026.

The short version
For new projects, WordPress wins this matchup in 2026 almost by default — not because Joomla broke, but because platform bets are ecosystem bets, and one ecosystem is compounding while the other contracts. For existing Joomla sites, the calculus is calmer than the trend headlines suggest: stability is real, and migration is a scheduled decision, not an evacuation.
WordPress is the right call if…
- It’s a new project — the default has this strong a burden of proof now
- You want ecosystem breadth, current guides, and hireable help
- Your Joomla site’s extensions are aging out from under it
Joomla still earns its keep if…
- Granular core ACL genuinely maps to your permission model
- Core multilingual is central and working well for you
- The existing site is stable, maintained, and doing its job
At a glance: ten dimensions
| Dimension | WordPress | Joomla | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market trajectory | 41.2% of all websites; plateaued but immense. | 1.2% and in long, steady decline from a mid-2000s peak near 10%+ of the CMS market. | WordPress |
| Access control (ACL) | Role system is basic; granular permissions need plugins. | Genuinely granular core ACL — the feature Joomla veterans still cite first, fairly. | Joomla |
| Multilingual | Plugin territory (WPML/Polylang-class). | Core multilingual out of the box — a real, native strength. | Joomla |
| Ecosystem vitality | Enormous and active: themes, plugins, integrations for everything. | Shrinking extension market; many once-standard extensions abandoned. | WordPress |
| Ease of use | Editors productive in an hour; the admin is the industry’s lingua franca. | Steeper and idiosyncratic: menus-drive-structure confuses newcomers to this day. | WordPress |
| Talent market | The largest in web work. | Thin and aging — finding experienced Joomla help is a genuine project. | WordPress |
| Performance (field data) | 50% of desktop origins passed CWV (Nov 2025 HTTP Archive data). | Not separately reported in the datasets we cite — we won’t invent a number. | Depends |
| Project health | Active roadmap, massive contributor base. | Alive (Joomla 5.x era) with a committed core community — but momentum is candidly modest. | WordPress |
| Content architecture | Post types + fields via plugins; the ecosystem fills every gap. | Categories and custom fields in core; capable, less extensible in practice today. | Depends |
| Long-term bet safety | As safe as web platforms get. | The honest risk: a shrinking ecosystem compounds — every year, fewer extensions, fewer hands. | WordPress |
Tally: WordPress 6 · Joomla 2 · Depends 2 — and note the performance row: no invented numbers where our datasets don’t report one (W3Techs, CMS usage survey · W3Techs, historical CMS trends).
The ecosystem argument, stated plainly
Platform choices are compounding bets on other people’s future work: extension authors, theme designers, tutorial writers, agencies, the person you’ll hire in three years. WordPress’s bet compounds upward — for all its plateaued share, the ecosystem remains the largest creative commons in web software (with its documented maintenance duty: Patchstack, State of WordPress Security 2026, 91% of vulnerabilities in plugins). Joomla’s compounds downward: every abandoned extension pushes another site toward migration, which thins the market further. Nothing about Joomla’s code causes this — Joomla's official documentation documents a capable, modern 5.x platform — but code has never been what platform bets are about.
That’s why the honest 2026 framing splits by situation: new projects should need a specific, current reason to choose the contracting ecosystem (the ACL and multilingual cases above are the real ones); existing sites should migrate on triggers, not vibes — and Google, as ever, referees none of it (Search Engine Journal, on Google's CMS-neutrality statements).
WordPress vs Joomla: FAQ
Including the migration questions most readers are actually here for.
Where we stand
Webvello builds WordPress sites and custom websites, and is paid for migrations — including the Joomla→WordPress kind this page discusses. That interest is why the “don’t migrate a healthy site” answer appears here in plain text.
Keep going
The pillar guide: Choosing a Website Platform in 2026All the comparisons, one decision framework, full evidence appendix.WordPress vs Drupal
The other open-source veteran — whose institutional case remains strong.
Read the guideWhy Businesses Move Away From WordPress
Migration reasoning, applied to the platform everyone migrates to.
Read the essayWebsite Redesign SEO Checklist
If you do migrate: the discipline that protects your rankings.
Use the checklistWordPress Development
Where most Joomla migrations land, built properly.
Explore